Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 F.2d 113 - Carolyn Harnett v. George A. Ulett

Carolyn Harnett v. George A. Ulett’s Empirical Analysis

466 F.2d 113 · 1972

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Perry v. Sindermann · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Roth and Sinderman adhere to the principle that absent contractual, legislative or constitutional provision on the subject, the power of removal is incident to the power of appointment, and government employment can be revoked at the will of the appointing officer.” 466 F.2d at 116-117 (emphasis added).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The requirements of procedural due process apply only to the deprivation of interests encompassed within the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of liberty and property . . . but the range of interests protected by procedural due process is not infinite.” 408 U.S. at 569 , 92 S.Ct. at 2705 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “governmental conduct likely will * * * impose a stigma upon the employee that will foreclose future opportunities to practice his chosen profession * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.