Young v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
466 F.2d 1329 · 1972
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 11 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Flaks v. Koegel (1974), Miley v. Oppenheimer & Co. (1981)
30 federal appellate · 11 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on United States v. Atkinson · Myzel v. Fields · United States v. Kovel · Konigsberg v. State Bar of California · Tullock v. Joab Mulvane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The rights and remedies provided by this chapter shall be in addition to any and all other rights and remedies that may exist at law or in equity .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A reasonable limiting effect is given by interpreting § 28(a) as meaning that if a federal claim is maintained as here, recovery of actual damages twice on separate claims in the action is prohibited, but that if the elements of a state claim are necessarily found to exist, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees allowed under state law are not barred. We feel we should construe the Act in a way that would save these rights under state law. Therefore, we conclude we should sustain the punitive damages and attorney’s fees awarded here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.