Harold l.loudenslager v. Margaret Bittinger Teeple’s Empirical Analysis
466 F.2d 249 · 1972
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 7 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Ingram v. Kumar (1978), Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc. (1994)
10 federal appellate · 7 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Thompson v. Peck · Ehrhardt v. Costello · 262 F. Supp. 106 - Newman v. Freeman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Relation Back of Amendments. Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading. . . .”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.