Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

466 F.3d 549

Docket No. 00-6136.

House v. Bell

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2006-10-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2016

2 counsel of record

Relies on House v. Bell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stephen M. Kissinger, Federal Defender Services, Knoxville, TN, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Alice B. Lustre, Asst. Atty. General, Jennifer L. Smith, Asst. Atty. General, Office of the Attorney General, Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General, Paul G. Summers, Attorney General, Tennessee Attor*550ney General’s, Nashville, TN, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶3ORDER

¶4This appeal is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, House v. Bell, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2064, 165 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006). In light of the Court’s opinion (and the Tennessee attorney general’s statement in respondent’s brief before the Supreme Court that unexhausted issues remain under Tenn.Code. Ann. § 40-30-117(a)(2)(4)), we ask that the parties submit letter briefs addressing whether remand to the courts of Tennessee is appropriate in order to allow petitioner to exhaust his state-court remedies on his actual innocence claim.

¶5Letter briefs shall be due within sixty days of this order and shall not exceed fifteen pages.

/466/f3d/549 · .json · Public domain