Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 F.3d 708 - United States v. Staten

United States v. Staten’s Empirical Analysis

466 F.3d 708 · 2006

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably United States v. Grier (2007), United States v. Treadwell (2010)

35 federal appellate · 1 district ·

550200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Koon v. United States · Stinson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the actual effect a given fact had on the sentence that the district court ultimately imposed, not on whether the district court was required to give a fact it found the effect it did”) (emphasis in original). 6 . In his brief on appeal, Grubbs contends the district court did not use a preponderance of the evidence standard for proving evidence, but instead only weighed whether the evidence was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'where an extremely disproportionate sentence results from the application of an enhancement,' ” Id. at 718 (quoting Staten, 466 F.3d at 717 ), that statement was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.