Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

466 F.3d 747

Docket No. 04-35468.

Odom v. Microsoft Corp.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 28, 2006.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2006-09-28

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-09-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Javier Martinez v. Lowell Clark (2022), Freeman v. R

1 federal appellate ·

330200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Beth Terrell, Tousley Brain Stephens P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, Daniel C. Girard, Esq., Aaron M. Sheanin, Esq., Girard Gibbs and de Bartolomeo LLP, San Francisco, CA, Anthony K. Lee, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶2Charles C. Sweedler, Esq., Peter Breslauer, Esq., Charles B. Casper, Esq., Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, Philadelphia, PA, Jonathan M. Palmer, Esq., Heller Ehrman, LLP, Seattle, WA, Michael J. Shepard, Esq., Heller Ehrman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Timothy M. Block, Esq., Robbins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Minneapolis, MN, Stacy S. Schwartz, Esq., Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi, Los Angeles, CA, James Richard Murray, Gordon Murray Tilden, LLP, Seattle, WA, J. Kevin Snyder, Esq., Dykema Gossett LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

¶3Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

¶4ORDER

¶5Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

/466/f3d/747 · .json · Public domain