Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 F.3d 880 - Robbins v. Social Security Administration

Robbins v. Social Security Administration’s Empirical Analysis

466 F.3d 880 · 2006

Citation profile

172
cited by 172 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 37 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 172 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Molina v. Astrue (2012), Orn v. Astrue (2007)

20 federal appellate · 37 district ·

1200200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Magallanes v. Bowen · Thomas v. Barnhart · Bunnell v. Sullivan · Bayliss v. Barnhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 172 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] reviewing court must consider the entire record as a whole and may not affirm simply by isolating a specific quantum of supporting evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “makes a finding of malingering based on affirmative evidence thereof, [he] may only find [the claimant] not credible by making specific findings as to credibility and stating clear and convincing reasons for each.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[E]ven if the ALJ had given facially legitimate reasons for his partial adverse credibility finding, the complete lack of meaningful explanation gives this court nothing with which to assess its legitimacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.