Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 F. Supp. 141 - Henry v. Texas Tech University

466 F. Supp. 141 - Henry v. Texas Tech University’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
October 2003
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2003 · most notably Hall v. Medical College of Ohio (1984), United Carolina Bank v. Board of Regents of Stephen F. Austin State University (1982)

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Edelman v. Jordan · Hans v. State of Louisiana · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Eleventh Amendment cases the question of whether the state is ‘the real party in interest’ is one of federal law, but federal courts must examine the powers, characteristics and relationships created by state law in order to determine whether the suit is in reality against the state itself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.