Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 FSUPP 234 - Westridge v. Wright

Westridge v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Mauney v. Millar · Mock v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, under the established law of Arkansas, statements in pleadings in judicial proceedings are absolutely privileged as long as the statements are relevant and pertinent to the issues raised in the case. Statements in pleadings, if relevant and pertinent to the issues, are absolutely privileged even if the statements are false and made maliciously. The issue which the court must resolve . . . is . . . whether the allegations were relevant and pertinent . . . It is clear that this issue is one to be resolved by the court rather than a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.