Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 MASS 707 - Commonwealth v. Woods

Commonwealth v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

54 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Commonwealth v. Latimore · United States v. Mandujano · United States v. Washington · Davis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The inferences that support a conviction 'need only be reasonable and possible; [they] need not be necessary or inescapable.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “adopt[ed] a rule that where, at the time a person appears to testify before a grand jury, the prosecutor has reason to believe that the witness is either a 'target' or is likely to become one, the witness must be advised, before testifying, that (1) he or she may refuse to answer any question if a truthful answer would tend to incriminate the witness, and (2) anything that he or she does say may be used against the witness in a subsequent legal proceeding”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a person as to whom the prosecutor or the grand jury has substantial evidence linking him or her to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a putative defendant”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.