Mottern v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
April 1997
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on German v. State · Twyman v. State · Stutzman v. State · Sexton v. State · Martin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"On the other hand, the state offered no evidence of prejudice such as unavailability of its witnesses, records, test results, or any other reason why it would be impossible or extremely difficult to present its case against Mottern at this time".”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Gibbens v. State · Holland v. State“Compliance with Ind.Code § 9-4-7-9 is equally as obligatory as compliance with Ind.Code § 35-4.1-1-3 (now Ind.Code § 35-35-1-2), and the consequences of noncompliance are equally fatal to the validity of the guilty plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Freeman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.