State v. Mejia’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 23 U.S.C. § 163
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz · 135 S. Ct. 2551 - Johnson v. United States · Alleyne v. United States · Descamps v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Legislature intend[ed] . . . the provisions of [the] act related to comparability of an out-of-jurisdiction offense . . . be liberally construed to allow comparable offenses, regardless of whether the elements are identical to or narrower than the corresponding Kansas offense, to be included in a person's criminal history,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Myers · State v. Myers“(j) For the purposes of determining whether an offense is comparable, the following shall be considered: (1) The name of the out-of-jurisdiction offense; (2) the elements of the out-of-jurisdiction offense; and (3) whether the out-of-jurisdiction offense prohibits similar conduct to the conduct prohibited by the closest approximate Kansas offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Myers · State v. Patton“'conviction' includes: . . . conviction of a violation of . . . any law of another jurisdiction that would constitute an offense that is comparable to the offense described in subsection (i)(1) or (i)(2).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Myers · State v. Myers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.