Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 SO2D 619 - Vuskovich v. Thorne

Vuskovich v. Thorne’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1986
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tuttle v. Tuttle · 424 So. 2d 531 - McCullough v. Hart · 434 So. 2d 1150 - Blanchard v. Fontana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There can be no partition, when the use of the thing held in common is indispensable to the coheirs, to enable them to enjoy, or to derive an advantage from the portion of the effects of the succession falling to them, such as an entry which serves as a passage to several houses, or a way common to several estates, and other things of the same kind.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.