466 So. 2d 81 - Ex Parte Anonymous’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2011
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 353 So. 2d 1384 - Brown v. State · 404 So. 2d 639 - McKinney v. State · 387 So. 2d 825 - Young v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In making the determination that the motion of the State should be granted, the Court has considered among other relative [sic] factors, the following: “a. the nature of the present alleged offense(s). “b. the extent and nature of the child’s prior delinquency record. “c. the nature of the past treatment efforts. “d. the nature of the youth’s response to such treatment efforts. “e. the demeanor of the youth. “f. the extent and nature of the youth’s physical and mental maturity. “g. the interest of the youth with reference to discipline or legal restraint; and “h. the report prepared by the Court Probation Office concerning the youth, his/her family, his/her environment and the factors set forth above.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"The procedural requirements for juvenile hearings are prescribed by Rule 24 of the Alabama Rules of Juvenile Procedure. These requirements were promulgated with the protection of the juvenile's due process rights in mind. "The first sentence of Rule 24 states that the hearing shall commence with the court's verifying that all necessary parties are present and ready to proceed. This verification is to be spread upon the record. . . . Next, the court (as per Rule 24) is required to explain several items to the parties:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"The Court having considered the relevant factors contained in Section 12-15-34, Code of Alabama 1975, finds that said child is not committable to an institution or agency for the mentally retarded or mentally ill; that the best interests of the child and public would be to grant the Motion to Transfer...."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.