Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 So. 2d 910 - Womble v. State

466 So. 2d 910 - Womble v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. United States · 440 So. 2d 278 - Sanders v. State · Ware v. State · 440 So. 2d 1001 - Tiller v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Sanders decision suggests, however, that an evidentiary hearing is not required in those cases which could be disposed of on a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, i.e., where "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and where the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Sanders, supra at 285, n. 4 . * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... unless the (petitioner's) application is so lacking in merit as to justify summary dismissal under (that standard), the petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a defendant need not be informed of ineligibility for parole before entering a plea of guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.