Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 1987
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ramos v. State · Pendleton v. State · 172 Tex. Crim. 317 - Lopez v. State · Younger v. State · Preston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . fact that a witness cannot be positive in his identification goes to the weight of the testimony and not to its admissibility. Terry v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 283 , 103 S.W.2d 766 ; Graves v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 591 , 40 S.W.2d 100 ; Pruitt v. State, 114 Tex.Cr.R. 281 , 25 S.W.2d 870 . “ . . . The court or the jury may rely upon all of the evidence in the case to determine the sufficiency thereof; that offeréd by the appellant as well as that offered by the state.” (Citations omitted.) 466 S.W.2d at 314 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jenkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.