Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 SW2D 32 - Long v. Smith

Long v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meaders v. Biskamp · Van Zandt v. Fort Worth Press · Gulf Liquid Fertilizer Co. v. Titus · Tenneco Oil Company v. Padre Drilling Company · Texas Casualty Insurance Company v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . The requirement that the objections to the court’s charge shall be in writing will be sufficiently complied with if such objections are dictated to the court reporter in the presence of and with the consent of the court and opposing counsel, before the reading of the court’s charge to the jury, and are subsequently transcribed and the court’s ruling and official signature endorsed thereon and filed with the clerk in time to be included in the transcript. . . . ” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.