De Leon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably Standley v. State (1975), Ex Parte Giles (1973)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Campbell v. State · Hulsey v. State · McDonald v. State · Capuchino v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The condition as set forth in the judgment by the court which was shown to have been served upon the appellant does not indicate when or how frequently the appellant was to report to the probation officer. While the motion to revoke probation alleged that the appellant had failed to report to ‘probation office as directed, and at least once per month/ there was no evidence offered that the court had so directed or made such requirement a part of the probationary conditions.” (emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State““Report to the probation officer as directed; . . . No Supervisory Fee.” (Emphasis supplied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.