Raymond v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2023
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Jones · State v. Vainio · Lang v. Murch · State v. Williams · 58 Or. App. 398 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Maine’s highest court recognize[d] that ‘any physical force’ suffices to satisfy the ‘physical force’ element in [robbery]. So, for example, ‘the mere act of snatching a purse from the hand of a victim’ is thus ‘a sufficient act of physical force required for robbery,’ even if the robber never made ‘direct bodily contact’ with the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.