Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 A2D 165 - State v. Durgan

State v. Durgan’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably State v. Sands (1985), State v. Wilder (2000)

25 state decisions

1201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Flick · State v. Saba · State v. Russo · State v. Mosher · State v. Joy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “2. Proof that the defendant was in exclusive possession of property that had recently been taken under circumstances constituting a violation of this chapter or of chapter 27 shall give rise to a presumption that the defendant is guilty of the theft or robbery of the property, as the case may be, and proof that the theft or robbery occurred under circumstances constituting a violation of section 401 also shall give rise to a presumption that the defendant in exclusive possession of property recently so taken is guilty of the burglary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “2. Proof that the defendant was in exclusive possession of property that had recently been taken under circumstances constituting a violation of this chapter ... give[ ] rise to a presumption that the defendant is guilty of the theft ... of the property, ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.