Hellenic Lines, Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. The Embassy of Pakistan, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis
467 F.2d 1150 · 1972
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2015
11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Conqueror · Northern Pacific Railway Company v. American Trading Company · Nick v. Dunlap · United States v. Le Roy Dyal Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the Supreme Court said in The Apollon, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 362, 378 [6 L.Ed. Ill] (1824), “demurrage is merely an allowance or compensation for the delay or detention of a vessel”. Accord, Continental Grain Co. v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 22 F.Supp. 49, 54 (S.D.N.Y.1938). Thus, the most logical interpretation of the “no demurrage” clause is that it precludes liability for detention damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Detention is wholly unconnected with physical loss or damage to goods”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.