Jess Cancino v. Walter E. Craven’s Empirical Analysis
467 F.2d 1243 · 1972
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 1992 · most notably United States v. Donn (1981), Alan Daniel Wilwording v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri Penitentiary (1974)
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. United States · McMann v. Richardson · Sanders v. United States · Parker v. North Carolina · Roland Wayne Wright v. Walter E. Craven, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“district court, on remand, will have the opportunity to consider [habeas petitioner] Cancino's attack on his admission of the prior felony in the light of Wright.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Neyland v. Blackburn“may not be accepted unless the defendant understands the consequences of the admission”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Neyland v. Blackburn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.