Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 F.2d 897 - United States v. Reddoch

United States v. Reddoch’s Empirical Analysis

467 F.2d 897 · 1972

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Jellibeans Incorporated v. Skating Clubs of Georgia Inc (1983), Rowe v. Griffin (1982)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

240197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · McAllister v. United States · In Re Disbarment of Isserman · United States v. State of Louisiana · United States v. West Peachtree Tenth Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i)t is the policy of the United States to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout the United States”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Credibility choices and the resolution of conflicting testimony are for the trial court, if not clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This being a suit for injunctive relief, not one at common law, there was no right to a jury trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.