Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 F.3d 659 - United States v. Eberhart

United States v. Eberhart’s Empirical Analysis

467 F.3d 659 · 2006

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2024

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

110200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Olano · Eberhart v. United States · Graves v. United States · United States v. Rollins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction as to his or her particular theory of defense provided: (1) the instruction presents an accurate statement of the law; (2) the instruction reflects a theory that is supported by the evidence; (3) the instruction reflects a theory which is not already part of the charge; and (4) the failure to include the instruction would deny the appellant a fair trial.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “by offering testimony of an eyewitness that the recording accurately reflects”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.