United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
467 F.3d 785 · 2006
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2021
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Bailey v. United States · Kontrick v. Ryan · Eberhart v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“both the text of [Federal Rule 48 ] and its roots in the common law doctrine of nolle prosequi cast doubt on Rule 48's applicability post-conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Juan Villar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.