Vann v. Kempthorne’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1301 (§ 201 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 461 · 25 U.S.C. § 503 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Hafer v. Melo · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · Runyon v. McCrary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a federal court may not entertain a civil action within the jurisdiction of tribal forums until the plaintiff has exhausted his or her available remedies in tribal courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“asserted a cause of action against the Secretary under the APA which is only cognizable in federal courts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.