Commonwealth v. Hearns’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Michigan v. Mosley · Davis v. United States · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Smith v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is an investigative or law enforcement officer investigating a 'designated offense,' and that officer is either (1) a party to the communication, or (2) has advance authorization from a party to the communication to intercept the conversation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is reasonable to infer from the information available to the police at the time that the shooting at issue was intended as an act of intimidation directed at [a rival gang] and related to its competing illegal enterprises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a continuing conspiracy among highly organized and disciplined groups to engage in supplying illegal goods and services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.