Commonwealth v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · Brigham City v. Stuart · Graham v. Florida · New Jersey v. New York · Commonwealth v. Forde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This exception 'permits the police to enter a home without a warrant when they have an objectively reasonable basis to believe that there may be someone inside who is injured or in imminent danger of physical harm.' " Duncan , 467 Mass. at 749 -750 , 7 N.E.3d 469 , quoting from Commonwealth v. Peters , 453 Mass. 818 , 819, 905 N.E.2d 1111 (2009). "The need to protect or preserve life or avoid serious injury is justification for what would be otherwise illegal absent an exigency or emergency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although the broader 'exigent circumstances' exception generally requires a showing of probable cause, such a showing is not necessary in emergency aid situations, because the purpose of police entry is not to investigate criminal activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. Walsh“Such scenarios [of emergency aid] present one type of 'exigent circumstance' that obviates the need for a warrant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.