Canaday v. Canaday’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2011
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 173 Ind. App. 5 - In Re the Marrage of Miles · 166 Ind. App. 409 - Linton v. Linton · 174 Ind. App. 599 - In Re the Marriage of Osborne · Morphew v. Morphew · 178 Ind. App. 336 - Farthing v. Farthing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"What constitutes a reasonable attorney fee is a matter largely within the court's discretion. Svetich v. Svetich, (1981) Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 191 .... [Slince the judge is considered an expert, our decisions continue to adhere to the view that he may judicially know what constitutes a reasonable fee. Farthing v. Farthing, (1978) 178 Ind.App. 336 , 382 N.E.2d 941 . He is accordingly not bound to accept the evidence presented as to the reasonable value of an attorney's services. McBride v. McBride, (1981) Ind.App., 427 N.E.2d 1148 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lowery v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.