Janke v. Janke’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division · Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board · Malcolm v. Malcolm · Pendleton v. Rumsfeld · D. M. W. Contracting Co. v. Stolz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] circuit court may not overturn a referee’s findings unless the record reflects that, based upon its own review of all the evidence, the court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. The referee’s conclusions of law, however, are freely reviewable and may be overturned whenever they are thought to be incorrect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tovsland v. Reub
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.