Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 P.2d 527 - Britton v. State

Britton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 95 Okla. Crim. 6 - Moran v. State · 4 Okla. Crim. 508 - Davis v. State · Templeton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The proof of the fact of intoxication or sobriety does not require special knowledge, and need not be made by expert testimony. The witness by whom the proof is sought to be made may describe the facts and circumstances which led to his conclusion, or he may simply state the fact of intoxication or sobriety.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.