Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 P3D 609 - LOFTHOUSE (JASON) VS. STATE

LOFTHOUSE (JASON) VS. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chatwin v. United States · Rosales-Mireles v. United States · Frazier v. People · State v. Catanio · Butler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “their plain and ordinary meanings unless the context requires a technical meaning or a different meaning is apparent from the context”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. STATE, DEP'T OF CORR. v. DIST. CT. (CAPERONIS) (CIVIL) · 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 11 - COSBY, JR. v. LESLIE (NRAP 5)
  2. “has more than one plain and ordinary meaning,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. AZG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC · 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 30 - Sisolak v. Polymer80, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.