Baglio v. State

John Peter BAGLIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 1985.

Rehearing Denied May 15, 1985.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-02-20

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[d]efense counsel not only failed to object but specifically stated that he had no objection to the admission”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 766 So. 2d 252 - Fripp v. State

Relies on 384 So. 2d 212 - DeLuca v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-02-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2000

7 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for sexual battery. The primary error asserted is the denial of a motion to suppress the physical evidence obtained as a result of appellant's allegedly unlawful arrest. Defendant's motion to suppress was denied prior to trial. During trial, however, the physical evidence was admitted. Defense counsel not only failed to object but specifically stated that he had no objection to the admission of same. Accordingly, the right to appellate review of the issue has been waived. DeLuca v. State,384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

¶5DOWNEY, HURLEY, and BARKETT, JJ., concur.