¶1After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.
467 So. 2d 1093
467 So.2d 1093
10 Fla.L.Weekly 1107
Byrd v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 1, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-05-01
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1995
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1985-05-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →