Chessler v. State

Rosemarie CHESSLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1985.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-05-01

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1990

10 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“It is appropriate to impose a sentence of community control to be followed by a term of probation.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 552 So. 2d 347 - Daigle v. State

Relies on 464 So. 2d 1218 - State v. Schaffer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lee Rosenthal, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3LETTS, Judge.

¶4We agree with the First District's recent decision in Williams v. State,464 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) reh'g denied,464 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), holding that the trial court cannot properly impose a period of community control to be followed by a period of probation.

¶5Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence the defendant.

¶6 *1103 We find no merit in the remaining points on appeal.

¶7REVERSED AND REMANDED.

¶8HERSEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.