467 So. 2d 426 - Noah v. Noah’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 466 So. 2d 203 - Tronconi v. Tronconi · 367 So. 2d 1016 - Williamson v. Williamson · 411 So. 2d 325 - Peak v. Peak · McQuiggan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the wife was a good wife, in view of her contributions to the marriage, the disparity in the parties' income, the husband's ability to pay alimony, the wife's inability to earn a sum sufficient to support herself, the parties' ages, the length of the marriage, the wife's ill health, and because of the husband's gross marital misconduct, the court will award the wife a combination of permanent and lump sum alimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“DOES THE WILLIAMSON DECISION PERMIT A TRIAL JUDGE TO MAKE A DISTRIBUTION OF VIRTUALLY ALL THE ASSETS TO A FAITHFUL WIFE, IN PART BECAUSE HER HUSBAND HAS BEEN UNFAITHFUL?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“even if the claiming spouse commits adultery, that should not be held against him or her if the non-claiming spouse has likewise sinned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.