Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 SO2D 503 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

170
cited by 170 later decisions
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 167 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 170 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis (1994), State v. Green (1995)

2 federal appellate · 167 state decisions

5701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chimel v. California · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Sheppard v. Maxwell · United States v. Edwards · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a question addressed to the trial court's sound discretion which will not be disturbed on appeal absent an affirmative showing of error and abuse of discretion.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances known to the officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing the person to be arrested has committed a crime.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A change of venue shall be granted when the applicant proves that by reason of prejudice existing in the public mind or because of undue influence, or that for any other reason, a fair and impartial trial cannot be obtained in the parish where the prosecution is pending. In deciding whether to grant a change of venue the court shall consider whether the prejudice, the influence, or the other reasons are such that they will affect the answers of jurors on the voir dire examination or the testimony of witnesses at the trial.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.