Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

467 So. 2d 841

467 So.2d 841

10 Fla.L.Weekly 1092

Honaker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-05-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1992

2 state decisions

Relies on Clem v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm, based on the authority of Clem v. State, 462 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), in which this court certified the following questions to the Supreme Court of Florida:

1. WHEN A PERSON IS SENTENCED AS A YOUTHFUL OFFENDER PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 958.-05(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (1979), DOES THE CIRCUIT COURT HAVE JURISDICTION TO REVOKE THE COMMUNITY CONTROL PROGRAM STATUS OF THAT PERSON?
2. IF THE ANSWER TO THE FOREGOING QUESTION IS IN THE POSITIVE, MAY THE CIRCUIT COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF A YOUTHFUL OFFENDER’S COMMUNITY CONTROL PROGRAM STATUS, TREAT THE DEFENDANT AS THOUGH IT HAD NEVER PLACED HIM IN COMMUNITY CONTROL AND SENTENCE HIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 948.06(1), FLORIDA STATUTES?

¶2We again certify those questions to the Supreme Court of Florida as questions of great public importance.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
/467/so2d/841 · .json · Public domain