Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 SW2D 608 - Wallace v. State

Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1990

13 state decisions

110197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amador-Gonzalez v. United States · Taylor v. State · Baity v. State · Myricks v. United States · Denham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every person shall have an operator’s, commercial operator’s, or chauffeur’s license, in his immediate possession at all times when operating a motor vehicle and shall display the same upon demand of a magistrate or any officer of a court of competent jurisdiction or any peace officer . . . Any peace officer may stop and detain any motor vehicle operator for the purpose of determining whether such person has a driver’s license as required by this Section.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Any peace officer may arrest, without warrant, persons found in suspicious places and under circumstances which reasonably show that such persons have been guilty of some felony or breach of the peace, or threaten, or are about to commit some offense against the laws.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.