Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

467 S.W.3d 395

State v. McClendon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2015

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2015-06-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Corey McClendon (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of two counts of forcible sodomy and one count of kidnapping. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for a mistrial during the prosecutor’s cross-examination of Defendant; and (2) failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial during the prosecutor’s closing argument.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/467/sw3d/395 · .json · Public domain