In re Vanhook’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Dewsnup v. Timm · Raleigh v. Illinois Department of Revenue · Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. · In the Matter of Terry Gober Terry Gober v. Terra + Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allows a court to abstain from hearing a particular matter arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under title 11, in the interest of justice or in the interest of comity with state courts or respect for state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Mendez“vary with the particular circumstances of each case”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Mendez“no one factor is necessarily determinative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Mendez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.