United States v. Parish’s Empirical Analysis
468 F.2d 1129 · 1972
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2006 · most notably State v. Villafane (1976), United States v. Pollack (1976)
41 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Mapp v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Marion · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“require[s] dismissal of the indictment if it [is] shown at trial that the pre-indictment delay in [the] case caused substantial prejudice to [the accused's] rights to a fair trial and that the delay was a purposeful device to gain tactical advantage over the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[l]ength of delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.