James E. Redus v. Harold R. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis
468 F.2d 606 · 1972
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McMann v. Richardson · Robinson v. United States · Parrott v. Brewer · Redus v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Constitution guarantees the right to competent counsel, we cannot expect counsel to be omniscient or clairvoyant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McFadden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.