Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

468 F.2d 624

Docket No. 27659.

Smith v. Leach

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-11-08

2 counsel of record

Relies on 340 F. Supp. 1120 - Allway Taxi, Inc. v. City of New York

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-11-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

8019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rindskopf, Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Allen L. Chancey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., Atlanta, Ga., Robert V. Zener, Patricia S. Baptiste, Attys., William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Div., Donald Horowitz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

It having been made known to the court that appellant Smith has been granted a dependency deferment and is not eligible for induction under current Selective Service policies, the appeal in this cause is dismissed as moot.

/468/f2d/624 · .json · Public domain