United States v. Guaraldi’s Empirical Analysis
468 F.2d 774 · 1972
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3806 · 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on United States v. Seeger · Welsh II v. United States · Ehlert v. United States · United States v. Haughton · United States v. Brooks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inasmuch as we have just held that there was a basis in fact for the local board’s finding of insincerity, appellant’s contention that the appeal board was required to state reasons for de nying appellant’s claim is clearly without merit. In affirming, without stating reasons, the appeal board by implication adopted the local board’s rationale. Notwithstanding appellant’s vigorous argument to the contrary, the local board gave only one basic reason for its denial, i. e. insincerity. . . . Where, as here, the reason can be determined from the agency record with reasonable certainty, the appeal board is not required to restate it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.