Community House, Inc. v. City of Boise, Idaho’s Empirical Analysis
468 F.3d 1118 · 2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Lemon v. Kurtzman · Marks v. United States · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of advancing religion (i) whether governmental aid results in government indoctrination; (ii) whether recipients of the aid are defined by reference to religion; and (iii) whether the aid creates excessive government entanglement with religion. See Agostini, 521 U.S. at 234, 117 S.Ct. 1997; see also Mitchell, 530 U.S. at 808, 120 S.Ct. 2530 (Thomas, J., plurality); Mitchell, 530 at 845 (O'Connor, J., concurring). The same primary criteria are considered when determining whether aid constitutes an impermissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“) to convert another one of its facilities into a shelter for women and children. The safety concerns are the type of legitimate interests, not based on stereotypes, that may satisfy the first prong of the test for allowing a facially discriminatory provision. Indeed, the majority recognizes that safety concerns might justify the men-only policy. ( See maj. op. 1051) I would affirm as I agree with the district court that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“housing as well as 39 single-residence apartments. Community House had accommodations for the disabled, and about three-fourths of its residents were disabled. This mix of homeless single adults, families with children, and the disabled (mentally and physically) would appear to be a volatile mix 3 I recognize that while the concept of a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.