Ual Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2020
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Buckley v. Valeo · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · United States v. Mead Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Letter Agreement between United and the ALPA exposed the [PBGC's] insurance fund to an 'unjustified increase' in liability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to the judiciary; [thus,] the PBGC participates as a litigant, not as the decision-maker.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires the PBGC to initiate litigation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.