Malone v. Barry

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-06-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2016

3 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-06-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and the amended brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

¶3ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 9, 2012, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.