Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 MASS 204 - Commonwealth v. Figueroa

Commonwealth v. Figueroa’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chimel v. California · Rakas v. Illinois · Green v. United States · Nix v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven where there is 'good reason' for a showup identification, it may still be suppressed if the identification procedure so needlessly adds to the suggestiveness inherent in such an identification that it is conducive to irreparable mistaken identification.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “police have reasonable grounds to believe that obtaining a warrant would be impracticable under the circumstances because the delay in doing so would pose a significant risk that ... evidence may be destroyed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “violates due process only where the defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that it is 'unnecessarily suggestive'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.