Polay v. McMahon’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 13 district · 17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kyllo v. United States · Agis v. Howard Johnson Co. · 24 Cal. 4th 1122 - Ketchum v. Moses · Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co. · Foley v. Polaroid Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To make out a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs were required to show (1) that [the defendant] intended, knew, or should have known that his conduct would cause emotional distress; (2) that the conduct was extreme and outrageous; (3) that the conduct caused emotional distress; and (4) that the emotional distress was severe.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“furthers the statute's underlying purposes of broadly protecting petitioning activity and promoting resolution of 'SLAPP' litigation 'quickly with minimum cost.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[M]ere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.