Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 468 MASS 379 - Polay v. McMahon

Polay v. McMahon’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 district · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kyllo v. United States · Agis v. Howard Johnson Co. · 24 Cal. 4th 1122 - Ketchum v. Moses · Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co. · Foley v. Polaroid Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To make out a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs were required to show (1) that [the defendant] intended, knew, or should have known that his conduct would cause emotional distress; (2) that the conduct was extreme and outrageous; (3) that the conduct caused emotional distress; and (4) that the emotional distress was severe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “furthers the statute's underlying purposes of broadly protecting petitioning activity and promoting resolution of 'SLAPP' litigation 'quickly with minimum cost.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[M]ere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.